- From: Held Martin ICM N MC MI E 6 <Martin.Held AT icn.siemens.de>
- To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Subject: AW: [SCTP-Discussion] Comments on Update on API definition (sctp. h)
- Date: Wed Feb 28 17:19:01 2001
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
Hi Michael, Hi Andreas,
two more comments on the new API:
Could you please provide #defines for the values of path_state,
association_state (etc.?)
Using the UDP socket, how would you send back a response to a received
message?
I think, besides the source address we need the source port in the
Socket_callback_function.
Actually, it would be nice to have a sending function which takes exactly
the same parameters as destination, as the ones received in
Socket_callback_function as source.
looking forward to linking SCTP-1.0
Martin
>
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>
Von: Andreas Jungmaier
>
[mailto:ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de]
>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2001 13:33
>
An:
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
Betreff: [SCTP-Discussion] Update on API definition (sctp.h)
>
>
>
Hello all !
>
>
After looking at Michaels comments, I have decided to change,
>
well, quite a few things (mainly names) -- knowing that I have
>
"opened Pandoras box" and will have to change the names throughout
>
the library ;-)
>
>
Notwithstanding, I would like to invite more comments, so
>
please: "Speak up now and not when it's too late !" :-)
>
>
Anyway, I think that this looks much better now, we have got
>
rid of a few things that were not nice, e.g. there are no
>
more functions
>
now, where the library has to allocate memory, which the user
>
would have
>
to free (as in the old sctp_status()), and the old sctp_status
>
function has been split up into three functions that are able to
>
read status values from a SCTP instance, and certain association,
>
or a certain path within an existing association.
>
These use all fixed size structures now.
>
>
--
>
>
Andreas Jungmaier
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------
>
E-mail is insecure. It may be read by other people, modified in the
>
course of transmission, or even faked (see
>
http://www.stopcarnivore.org) !
>
To protect your E-mail, use encryption programs, such as PGP or GPG,
>
which can be obtained for free from http://www.gnupg.org !!!!
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------
>
Andreas Jungmaier, Dipl.-Ing.
>
University of Essen email:
>
ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de
>
Computer Networking Technology Group Tel. : +49 (0201) 183-7636
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------
>
PGP Public Key and Fingerprint: see
>
http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------
>
- AW: [SCTP-Discussion] Comments on Update on API definition (sctp. h), Held Martin ICM N MC MI E 6, 02/28/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.