- From: Tuexen Michael <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
- To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] pls suggest
- Date: Mon Mar 12 16:03:01 2001
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
See my comments below.
Best regards
Michael
Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CS SE 51 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: Virendra K. Nahar
>
[SMTP:vknahar AT netlab.hcltech.com]
>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:23 PM
>
To: sctp
>
Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] pls suggest
>
>
hi
>
>
page 73 of RFC 2960 under heading says following-
>
>
(1) Set rwnd equal to the newly received a_rwnd minus the number of bytes
>
still outstanding after processing the
>
>
Cumulative TSN Ack and the Gap Ack Blocks.
>
>
I want to understand as to why the sender needs to substract the
>
oustanding bytes when a_rwnd itself suggests
>
>
the actual value at the receiver end pls elaborate.
>
[Tuexen Michael] The difference should be a good guess of what the
receiver will
accept, right? The receiver announced a bufferspace but can not know
what is in flight.
>
(2)Is there any sepatate draft which explains the concept of streaming i.e
>
as to how the receiver going to keep track of stream ID & sequence for that
>
stream.
[Tuexen Michael] It described in RFC 2960.
>
Thanks
>
>
nahar
>
>
>
- [SCTP-Discussion] pls suggest, Virendra K. Nahar, 03/12/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [SCTP-Discussion] pls suggest, Tuexen Michael, 03/12/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.