Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

I am using a pitifully old Linux kernel (2.2.14). I
can move up if required.

Where does this group stand on the BSD vs Linux
preference?

Mike

--- Michael Tuexen
<Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
wrote:
> Dear Vaclav, Michael
> what version of the operating system are you using?
> There are known bugs (the one we found at the last
> bakeoff) and
> these will be fixed with the next pre release
> (pre10) which will
> be published next week.
> This implementation was (and is) not build for
> performance. But for
> "normal" application the performance should be
> enough. There are several
> projects using this prototype.
> This implementation was tested in all three
> bakeoffs. But one of the rules
> of the bakeoffs is that not comparison information
> is given to anyone. It
> even does not make sense, because you are testing
> interoperability.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> You wrote:
> > Vaclav.
> > Thanks for the help. Are the "well-known" bugs
> > documented in the TODO file?
> > How is the throughput performance?
> > I see references to the bakeoffs. How did the
> package
> > perform at those events?
> > Michael
> > --- Vaclav Urbanek
> > <xurbanev AT fel.cvut.cz>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello Michael,
> > > I had exactly same problem!!!
> > >
> > > My solution:
> > >
> > > I only added the declaration of strucure
> in_pktinfo
> > > (from linux/in.h)
> > > directly into adaptation.c. It is terrible patch
> but
> > > it seems all work fine
> > > (only with well-known bugs <IMG
> SRC="/images/emoticon11.gif">)
> > >
> > > Redefinig of MIN and MAX isn�t important.
> > >
> > > Vaclav Urbanek
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > > Odes�latel: Michael Mueller
> <bhu5nji AT yahoo.com>
> > > > Komu:
> > > > discussion AT sctp.de
> > > > P�edm�t: [SCTP-Discussion] (no
> subject)
> > > > Datum: 22. kv�tna 2001 23:08
> > > >
> > > > I am having a compile problem. Can you give
> me
> > > some
> > > > advice?
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > The ./configure process seemed to find
> everything
> > > it
> > > > was looking for (excepting the IPv6 stuff).
> > > >
> > > >
> ===============================================
> > > > output from make:
> > > >
> > > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -g -O2
> > > -Wall
> > > > -DLINUX -I/usr/lib/glib/include -c
> adaptation.c
> > > > In file included from adaptation.c:56:
> > > > /usr/include/sys/param.h:56: warning: `MIN'
> > > redefined
> > > > /usr/include/glib.h:126: warning: this is the
> > > location
> > > > of the previous definition
> > > > /usr/include/sys/param.h:57: warning: `MAX'
> > > redefined
> > > > /usr/include/glib.h:123: warning: this is the
> > > location
> > > > of the previous definition
> > > > adaptation.c: In function
> `adl_receive_message':
> > > > adaptation.c:596: sizeof applied to an
> incomplete
> > > type
> > > > adaptation.c:621: sizeof applied to an
> incomplete
> > > type
> > > > adaptation.c:640: dereferencing pointer to
> > > incomplete
> > > > type
> > > >
> > > > =========offending code
> segment===================
> > > >
> > > > 589 int adl_receive_message(int sfd, void
> > > *dest,
> > > > int maxlen, union sockunion *from, union
> sockunion
> > > > *to)
> > > > 590 {
> > > > 591 int len;
> > > > 592 struct msghdr rmsghdr;
> > > > 593 struct cmsghdr *rcmsgp;
> > > > 594 struct iovec data_vec;
> > > > 595 #if defined (LINUX)
> > > > 596 unsigned char
> mbuf[(CMSG_SPACE(sizeof
> > > > (struct in_pktinfo)))];
> > > > 597 struct in_pktinfo *pktinfo;
> > > > 598 #else
> > > > 599 unsigned char
> mbuf[(CMSG_SPACE(sizeof
> > > > (struct in_addr)))];
> > > > 600 struct in_addr* dptr;
> > > > 601 #endif
> > >
> > > >
>
> > > >
> > > > ===========================================
> > > >
> > > > result of grepping on the struct name:
> > > >
> > > > [root@dev0 sctp]# grep -r in_pktinfo
> /usr/include
> > > > /usr/include/linux/in.h:struct in_pktinfo
> > > >
> > > > ===========================================
> > > > simply including /usr/include/linux/in.h
> creates
> > > more problems.
> > > >
> > =====
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
> prices
> > http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > discussion mailing list
> > discussion AT sctp.de
> > http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
> --
> Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de


=====


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Michael Mueller, 05/22/2001
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Vaclav Urbanek, 05/23/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Michael Mueller, 05/23/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Michael Tuexen, 05/23/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Michael Mueller, 05/23/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.