-
sctp
SCTP Discussions
Text archives Help
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock AT openss7.org>
- To: rekha nt <vijay AT mercurykr.com>
- Cc: discussion AT sctp.de
- Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] contradiction in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-03.txt
- Date: Fri Mar 15 10:32:01 2002
- Dsn-notification-to: <bidulock AT openss7.org>
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
- Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Vijay,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, rekha nt wrote:
>
> Hi Arun,
>
> I didnt get one thing.........i have written that thing below in
> the capital letters...
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
[snip]
> I THINK WHENEVER WE RECEIVE THE SACK WE SET THE ASSOC RETRANS COUNT
> AND PATH RETRANS COUNT TO ZERO....MAY BE I M WRONG
[snip]
No. Only when the SACK acknowledges outstanding data are the
counts zeroed. In the case of a_rwnd = 0 and window probing
the SACKs normally acknowledge nothing.
--brian
--
Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
bidulock AT openss7.org
¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦
¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦
¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦
- [SCTP-Discussion] contradiction in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-03.txt, Arun Prasad, 03/14/2002
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] contradiction in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-03.txt, rekha nt, 03/15/2002
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] contradiction in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-03.txt, Brian F. G. Bidulock, 03/15/2002
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] contradiction in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-03.txt, rekha nt, 03/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.
