First login?
Lost password?
 
 
sctp-discussion AT lists.franken.de 
SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Can Anyone tell me the major diff between this and the Ref implementation by sctp.org?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
  • To: discussion AT sctp.de
  • Cc: receivea <receivea AT 263.net>
  • Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Can Anyone tell me the major diff between this and the Ref implementation by sctp.org?
  • Date: Fri May 10 17:52:01 2002
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
Dear all,

the reference implementation available at www.sctp.org is more complete and
should behave better in error cases of the protocol. For the future you should
contact the authors, one of which has developed the FreeBSD / KAME implementation.

The implementation available at www.sctp.de is still under development and is
used by several groups for prototyping other SIGTRAN protocols. Also a socket API
is provided.

Regarding the Windows NT port. I know that some people have ported the implementation
from www.sctp.de to windows NT with no real difficulty. If you do it and provide the
patches to us we will include them in future releases.

Best regards
Michael
On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 10:44 AM, receivea wrote:

Hi all:

  Can you tell me the different between them?which one is better?and if i want to port them to WindowsNT which one is more easy?

thanks


Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page