Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Michael,

Pehaps Satendra was more interested in RSERPOOL or SIGTRAN?

--brian

On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Tuexen Michael wrote:

> Satendra,
>
> the two servers need to share the TCB. This is the same
> as for TCP. It is highly dependend on the the implementation
> of SCTP. For the prototype we do not support this.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
> Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
> ICN WN CC SE 7 e-Mail:
> Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: satendra
> > [mailto:satendra AT softhome.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:42 PM
> > To:
> > discussion AT sctp.de
> > Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I want the following configuration :
> > Two or more server(client) in association with a client one active
> > and one standby(automatic switch where active fails ) how can get that
> > in sctp??
> >
> > Please help
> > Thanks in anticipation
> >
> > Satendra
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discussion mailing list
> > discussion AT sctp.de
> > http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> >
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
bidulock AT openss7.org
¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦
¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦
¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature, satendra, 07/18/2002
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature, Tuexen Michael, 07/19/2002
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature, Brian F. G. Bidulock, 07/19/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.