-
sctp
SCTP Discussions
Text archives Help
- From: <DTepelmann AT web.de>
- To: discussion AT sctp.de
- Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming
- Date: Wed May 12 20:57:00 2004
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
- Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
Hi,
I got to a point where I'm get confused. Hope you can help.
I have adjust a second IP address for eth0 in
/etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-eth0:
...
BROADCAST='192.168.89.255'
IPADDR='192.168.89.84'
NETMASK='255.255.255.0'
IPADDR2='192.168.89.22'
NETMASK2='255.255.255.0'
NETWORK='192.168.89.0'
So I'm able to connect to my machine with 192.168.89.84 or with
192.168.89.22. It's working fine.
Reason of this was to test several SCTP association between 2 SCTP instances
on to different machines. But I got in trouble. All packets(INIT's) send to
x.x.x.22 will replied via x.x.x.84, which causes an SCTP Abort at the
initiator side.
This behaviour can easyly reproduced with mini_ulp(./mulp -s 192.168.89.70 -l
10002 -d 192.168.89.22 -r 7) vs. echo_server(./echo_server -s 192.168.89.22
-V).
How is it handled in sctplib, or is it a bug? Something wrong on my side? How
it's possible to handle more than one local address?
Thanks in advance,
DTepelmann
PS: Both machines have the following OS:
Linux 2.4.21-99-athlon #1 Wed Sep 24 13:34:32 UTC 2003 i686 athlon i386
GNU/Linux
sctplib-1.0.1
____________________________________________________________________
Der WEB.DE Virenschutz schuetzt Ihr Postfach vor dem Wurm Sober.A-F!
Kostenfrei fuer FreeMail Nutzer. http://f.web.de/?mc=021158
- [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, DTepelmann, 05/12/2004
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Andreas Jungmaier, 05/13/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, DTepelmann, 05/14/2004
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Michael Tuexen, 05/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.
