Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi James,

see my comments in-line.

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 14, 2005, at 6:19 PM, Doss, James wrote:

Hi Michael,

I also have the same question which Farhan raised some times back. Can
you please shed some light on this. The question: Are the sctp library
and LK_SCTP the same code one in user land and the other in kernel mode
version.

No. They are completely different implementations.

I do have a working version of sctp library but I have a copy of LK_SCTP
but never went through the code.

It will help.

Thanks
James
VeriSign Inc


-----Original Message-----
From:
discussion-admin AT sctp.de

[mailto:discussion-admin AT sctp.de]
On
Behalf Of Michael Tuexen
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:37 AM
To: Farhan Siddiqui
Cc:
discussion AT sctp.de
Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] LKSCTP and kernel 2.6

Hi Farhan,

the kernel provides 'only' a kernel module. For building programs you
also need header files and most likely a library providing some
functions from the socketAPI. These are included in LKSCTP besides
documentation and test programs.

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 13, 2005, at 8:32 PM, Farhan Siddiqui wrote:

Hi,

When I was building kernel 2.6, I realized that it has support for
SCTP. When the kernel already has support for SCTP, what is the need
for LKSCTP? Can someone explain? Or maybe I should be directing this
question to the lksctp mailing list I guess....


Thanks,
Farhan.

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] LKSCTP and kernel 2.6, Farhan Siddiqui, 10/13/2005
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [SCTP-Discussion] LKSCTP and kernel 2.6, Farhan Siddiqui, 10/13/2005
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] LKSCTP and kernel 2.6, Michael Tuexen, 10/14/2005
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] LKSCTP and kernel 2.6, Michael Tuexen, 10/14/2005

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.