SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Fwd:Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Fwd:SCTP with two process


Chronological Thread 
  • From: agodoi AT matrix.com.br
  • To: alexandre.maia AT siemens.com
  • Cc: discussion AT sctp.de,
  • Subject: Fwd:Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Fwd:SCTP with two process
  • Date: Wed Jan 18 16:13:57 2006
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>

>Hi,
>
>if you want to run multiple instances of the sctplib on one host
>you need to disable the out of the blue (OOTB) handling. The examples
>do this by using the -i options. See the code of the examples for the
>API.
>
>Best regards
>Michael
>
>On Jan 18, 2006, at 8:17 Uhr,
>agodoi AT matrix.com.br
> wrote:
>
>> I wrote two simple SCTP applications and everything worked fine. I
>> could
>> establish an association and changed some messages between two hosts.
>> But when I tried two instances (two processes) of the same application
>> I
>> had some problems, like this:
>>
>> I started an application in host 1 and another application in host 2.
>> Everything was fine. Then I started another instance (another process)
>> of the same application in host 1 and the previous association broke
>> down. My application received an ''connection lost notify".
>>
>> After that, I performed the same test using the applications provided
>> with SCTP lib package, like this:
>>
>> I started "discard_server" in host 1 and "test_tool" in host 2 using a
>> script provided by me. An association was established and "test_tool"
>> sent a lot of messages to "discard_server". Everything was OK. Then, I
>> started "echo_server" in host 1 and the previous association between
>> host 1 and host 2 was lost! I got the same problem in the application
>> wrote by me.
>>
>> Is that a known problem?
>>
>> Or
>>
>> Is that a known implementation feature?
>>
>>
>> I am currently using Red Hat 9 (kernel 2.4.20-8) and SCTP lib 1.0.4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discussion mailing list
>> discussion AT sctp.de
>> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>
>
>
>.









Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page