- From: Andreas Jungmaier <jungmaier AT web.de>
- To: discussion AT sctp.de, DavidPascoe <dp AT ii.net>
- Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] helping Multi-Homing work faster
- Date: Wed Feb 15 11:32:03 2006
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
- Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
Hi Dave,
you may want to have a look at an old paper of ours, which you can find
on
http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/inhalt/forschung/sctp_fb/sctp_links.html
It's named "On the Use of SCTP in Failover-Scenarios", and you
probably find some insight there.
Kind regards,
Andreas
David Pascoe
<dp AT ii.net>
schrieb am 15.02.06 08:32:32:
Hi All,
I can see that you get multiple paths when you create an association with
a multi-homed peer. Assuming that both ends are multi-homed, what could an
ULP do to speed up the multi-homing feature ?
I assume a heartBeat will bring down a path and choose another path when a
fault occurs.
Is there anything that the ULP do to help a path swap over. If say a local
interface goes down, we could guess that a path within the association
_might_ be gone because we would route out the down interface to the peer
address in that path - but ... it isn't a given that they route _to_us_
over the same interface that we route to them.
So I was wondering what people do to give positive event indications to
sctplib rather than wait for heartBeat to do it for you ? (also assuming
that you aren't running a routing protocol that will hide all of this from
you).
cheers,
davidp.
--
David Pascoe,
mailto:dp AT ii.net,
Western Australia
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail:
http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.