SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Shutdown


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Karel Zabloudil <karel.zabloudil AT sde.cz>
  • To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
  • Cc: discussion AT sctp.de
  • Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Shutdown
  • Date: Fri Feb 24 11:02:03 2006
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>

Michael,

can we avoid this ? if we call sctp_receiveUnacked/Unsent we get
the SCTP_WRONG_STATE error.

thanks,
Karel

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Michael Tuexen wrote:
Hi Karel,

the sctplib should wait for all DATA to be SACKed and then
send the SHUTDOWN. This is required by the SCTP state engine.

Best regards
Michael

On Feb 23, 2006, at 16:56 Uhr, Karel Zabloudil wrote:


and if it waits for ACKs, is it possible do discard any unsent
and unacked data so the SCTP library sends the SHUTDOWN imediatelly ?

thanks
Karel

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Karel Zabloudil wrote:

we control the size of send queue. the queue is full because the remote
end does not read. we call the sctp_shutdown.
is the shutdown send immediatelly or does SCTP library wait for ACKs
for already sent chunks ?

thanks
Karel Zabloudil
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion


_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page