SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP socket API compatibility


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
  • To: Horacio Sanson <hsanson AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
  • Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP socket API compatibility
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:47:31 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>

Hi Horacio,

comments in-line.

Best regards
Michael

On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Horacio Sanson wrote:

Just wondering how compatible is this sctplib to the current sctp
socket API draft and if this library supports the SCTP reliability
extension.
It should be pretty compatible and it does support PR-SCTP with
the time based policy.


Seems to me this implementation got stuck at version 1.0.7 and there
seems to be no further development. Is this the last release we will
We will be fixing bugs, but will not continue developing it. I switched
to the BSD/Mac OS X kernel implementation and he main developer is
not working for the university anymore (actually he got is PHD...).

see?? If so does anyone knows a good SCTP alternative for Windows
platforms??
Some guys from the Kyoto University ported the BSD kernel implementations
to Windows. I have not tested it, but you can give it a try.



thanks
Horacio
_______________________________________________
sctp-discussion mailing list
sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/sctp-discussion






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page