Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Prashanth,

without a stack trace I can not even guess... Please keep the
mailing list included since I have no experience in developing
software on Windows... So hopefully someone else can help.

Best regards
Michael
On Mar 13, 2009, at 6:24 AM, Prashanth wrote:

Hello Michael,

I am using Windows Xp, and now added critical section in the thread so that it stopped crashing in sctplib, but glib-1.2 is still carshes for load testing, say on 100 streams.

Thanks and reagrds,
Prashanth


----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tüxen" <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de >
To: "Prashanth"
<prashanth AT gl.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject)


Hi Prashanth,

the sctplib is *NOT* thread safe. You have to do the locking. See
the socketapilib as an example how to do it.

Which operating system are you using?

Best regards
Michael

On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Prashanth wrote:

Hello Michael,

It Shows it crashes in Glib-1.2. And Also I am Sending Chunk in One Thread And Recieving in One Thread, At This Time Sctplib.
Because CurrentAssociation is Assigned to Null by one thread.

thanks and regards,
prashanth

----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Tüxen"
<Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de
>
To: "Prashanth"
<prashanth AT gl.com>
Cc:
<sctp-discussion AT sctp.de>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject)

Hi Prashanth,

I think so... what is the stacktrace?

Best regards
Michael

On Mar 12, 2009, at 8:03 AM, Prashanth wrote:

Dear Sir,

I am Prashanth, I am Using Sctplib 1.0.8 for my application. In my application i am sending data on 100 stream it is crashing in Glib, is Sctplib is stable by using Glib-1.2?


Thanks and Regards
Prashanth v
_______________________________________________
sctp-discussion mailing list
sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/sctp-discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Prashanth, 03/12/2009
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Thomas Dreibholz, 03/12/2009
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Michael Tüxen, 03/12/2009
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • Message not available
          • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] (no subject), Michael Tüxen, 03/13/2009

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.