Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Dear Wolfgang,

could you provide an example of the usage of the sctplib
functions which resulted in that problem?

Best regards
Michael

--
e-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de

On Thu, Apr 5, 2001, Schruefer Wolfgang
<Wolfgang.Schruefer AT icn.siemens.de>
wrote:

>Folks,
>
>I had problems when sending because the datastructure of the
>bundling_instance in bundlung.c was not initialized (here it was bu_ptr-
>>got_send_address).
>So I inserted the following lines in function bu_new() ...
>
> ptr->ctrl_position = 0;
> ptr->sack_position = 0;
> ptr->data_position = 0;
> ptr->treating_received_chunks = FALSE;
> ptr->got_sack_request = FALSE;
> ptr->got_send_address = FALSE;
> ptr->got_sack = FALSE;
> ptr->got_shutdown = FALSE;
> ptr->requested_destination = 0;
>
>Viele Gruesse
>Wolfgang Schruefer
>
>**************************************
>Wolfgang Schrüfer SIEMENS AG
>ICN WN CC EKJ 14 TEL: +49 89 722-61646
>mailto:Wolfgang.Schruefer AT icn.siemens.de
>**************************************
>
>_______________________________________________
>discussion mailing list
>discussion AT sctp.de
>http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] Bug in bundling .c, Schruefer Wolfgang, 04/05/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Bug in bundling .c, Michael Tüxen, 04/05/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Bug in bundling .c, Andreas Jungmaier, 04/05/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Bug in bundling .c, Marc Boucher, 04/05/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Bug in bundling .c, Andreas Jungmaier, 04/05/2001
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Bug in bundling .c, Marc Boucher, 04/05/2001
        • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Bug in bundling .c, Andreas Jungmaier, 04/05/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.