SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tuexen Michael <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
  • To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
  • Cc: Marjan Bozinovski <marjanb AT kom.auc.dk>
  • Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
  • Date: Fri Jun 29 11:00:01 2001
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>

Dear all,
thanks for the help. To much of copy and paste..
Best regards
Michael

Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CS SE 5 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yeo Choon Kiat ICM CA MS MI E7 Extern
> [SMTP:ChoonKiat.Yeo.extern AT icn.siemens.de]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:09 AM
> To:
> 'discussion AT sctp.de'
> Cc: Marjan Bozinovski
> Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
>
> hi Michael and all,
> we have looked into the problem and we found that there is a typo in the
> file wrapper.c.
> The problem is caused by the function int SCTP_receive ( unsigned int
> associationID, unsigned short streamID, unsigned char *buffer, unsigned int
> *length) in wrapper.c.
>
> The SCTP_receive function should call sctp_receive, instead it calls
> SCTP_receive (itself) resulting in a loop.
> Just change this, do a 'make' again and all is back to normal.
>
> Regards,
> eric and gang.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael T> üxen
> [mailto:Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:27 PM
> To:
> discussion AT sctp.de
> Cc: Marjan Bozinovski
> Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
>
>
> Dear Marja,
>
> I will look into this tomorrow. Thank you very much for the report.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> --
> e-mail:
> Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001, Marjan Bozinovski
> <marjanb AT kom.auc.dk>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I tried the "discard_server" application at one PC and the
> >"terminal_application" at another PC, and started to send packets from the
> >terminal side to the discard server side. I was watching the traffic on the
> >interfaces with Ethereal. What I noticed (after many times repeating the
> >same procedure) is that, the association is always successfully
> established,
> >as well as the first sent packet, which is normally received and
> >acknowledged. But, starting from the second sent packet, any subsequent
> >packet does not trigger a display on the screen that a new data has
> arrived,
> >neither causes acknowledgments, instead, the discard server screen gets
> >frozen. Also, as a consequence, relatively large files are created in the
> >memory, probably depending on the number of sent packets.
> >Please check out if this is a bug or just my mistake.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Marjan
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >discussion mailing list
> >discussion AT sctp.de
> >http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page