- From: Tuexen Michael <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
- To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Cc: Marjan Bozinovski <marjanb AT kom.auc.dk>
- Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
- Date: Fri Jun 29 11:00:01 2001
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
Dear all,
thanks for the help. To much of copy and paste..
Best regards
Michael
Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CS SE 5 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: Yeo Choon Kiat ICM CA MS MI E7 Extern
>
[SMTP:ChoonKiat.Yeo.extern AT icn.siemens.de]
>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:09 AM
>
To:
>
'discussion AT sctp.de'
>
Cc: Marjan Bozinovski
>
Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
>
>
hi Michael and all,
>
we have looked into the problem and we found that there is a typo in the
>
file wrapper.c.
>
The problem is caused by the function int SCTP_receive ( unsigned int
>
associationID, unsigned short streamID, unsigned char *buffer, unsigned int
>
*length) in wrapper.c.
>
>
The SCTP_receive function should call sctp_receive, instead it calls
>
SCTP_receive (itself) resulting in a loop.
>
Just change this, do a 'make' again and all is back to normal.
>
>
Regards,
>
eric and gang.
>
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: Michael T> üxen
>
[mailto:Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de]
>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:27 PM
>
To:
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
Cc: Marjan Bozinovski
>
Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
>
>
>
Dear Marja,
>
>
I will look into this tomorrow. Thank you very much for the report.
>
>
Best regards
>
Michael
>
>
--
>
e-mail:
>
Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de
>
>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001, Marjan Bozinovski
>
<marjanb AT kom.auc.dk>
>
wrote:
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I tried the "discard_server" application at one PC and the
>
>"terminal_application" at another PC, and started to send packets from the
>
>terminal side to the discard server side. I was watching the traffic on the
>
>interfaces with Ethereal. What I noticed (after many times repeating the
>
>same procedure) is that, the association is always successfully
>
established,
>
>as well as the first sent packet, which is normally received and
>
>acknowledged. But, starting from the second sent packet, any subsequent
>
>packet does not trigger a display on the screen that a new data has
>
arrived,
>
>neither causes acknowledgments, instead, the discard server screen gets
>
>frozen. Also, as a consequence, relatively large files are created in the
>
>memory, probably depending on the number of sent packets.
>
>Please check out if this is a bug or just my mistake.
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Marjan
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>discussion mailing list
>
>discussion AT sctp.de
>
>http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
discussion mailing list
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
_______________________________________________
>
discussion mailing list
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.