- From: Yeo Choon Kiat ICM CA MS MI E7 Extern <ChoonKiat.Yeo.extern AT icn.siemens.de>
- To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Cc: Marjan Bozinovski <marjanb AT kom.auc.dk>
- Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
- Date: Fri Jun 29 09:10:02 2001
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
hi Michael and all,
we have looked into the problem and we found that there is a typo in the
file wrapper.c.
The problem is caused by the function int SCTP_receive ( unsigned int
associationID, unsigned short streamID, unsigned char *buffer, unsigned int
*length) in wrapper.c.
The SCTP_receive function should call sctp_receive, instead it calls
SCTP_receive (itself) resulting in a loop.
Just change this, do a 'make' again and all is back to normal.
Regards,
eric and gang.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Tüxen
[mailto:Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:27 PM
To:
discussion AT sctp.de
Cc: Marjan Bozinovski
Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour
Dear Marja,
I will look into this tomorrow. Thank you very much for the report.
Best regards
Michael
--
e-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001, Marjan Bozinovski
<marjanb AT kom.auc.dk>
wrote:
>
Hi,
>
>
I tried the "discard_server" application at one PC and the
>
"terminal_application" at another PC, and started to send packets from the
>
terminal side to the discard server side. I was watching the traffic on the
>
interfaces with Ethereal. What I noticed (after many times repeating the
>
same procedure) is that, the association is always successfully
established,
>
as well as the first sent packet, which is normally received and
>
acknowledged. But, starting from the second sent packet, any subsequent
>
packet does not trigger a display on the screen that a new data has
arrived,
>
neither causes acknowledgments, instead, the discard server screen gets
>
frozen. Also, as a consequence, relatively large files are created in the
>
memory, probably depending on the number of sent packets.
>
Please check out if this is a bug or just my mistake.
>
>
Best regards,
>
Marjan
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
discussion mailing list
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
- RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Discard server's incorrect behaviour, Yeo Choon Kiat ICM CA MS MI E7 Extern, 06/29/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.