Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

How about using sctplib and r-t embedded Linux? It might be less work than
writing SCTP for vxWorks if no commercial alternative exists. It has
attractive licensing terms too. This is just a flash of inspiration. I'm
using plain-old-Linux.

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "Opitz Derek-DOPITZ1"
<Derek.Opitz AT motorola.com>
To:
<discussion AT sctp.de>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:12 AM
Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks


>
> This may not be the right place for this question, so I apologize in
advance
> if it isn't.
>
> Anybody know of any SCTP stacks that support vxWorks or are easily
portable
> to vxWorks? We have trillium at the present, and were looking for an
> alternative.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Derek Opitz
> Motorola Cellular Infrastructure
> pager:
> 2456703 AT skytel.com
> phone: 817-245-6703
> email:
> Derek.Opitz AT motorola.com
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Opitz Derek-DOPITZ1, 08/16/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Michael Mueller, 08/16/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Andreas Jungmaier, 08/16/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Nahar,virendra, 08/17/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Michael Mueller, 08/17/2001
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Mark Oldham, 08/20/2001
        • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Andreas Jungmaier, 08/20/2001
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP stacks, Opitz Derek-DOPITZ1, 08/17/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.