- From: Dilip <dilris AT yahoo.com>
- To: discussion AT sctp.de
- Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] Re: discussion digest, Vol 1 #158 - 2 msgs
- Date: Thu Oct 11 15:20:02 2001
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
hi Michael
Thanks for your response.
1. you have answered my question regarding setting the
TIME before a path is considered inactive..
I also tried looking in the code and reached to a
similar conclusion that IF I change the
MAX_PATH_RETRANSMITS it would probably work..
But will be good when the next version let us change
it through application program..
2. I guess the switching back to the intial path could
be useful am not sure tough of the reason.. JUST
wanted to know if it was possible..
-------
Does anyone know of a SSL implementation on TOP of
SCTP..
Regards
Dilip
=====
Live For Today & not for Tomorrow...
As Tomorrow NEVER COMES..
Do Visit My Site at
http://www.angelfire.com/in/dilris
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
- [SCTP-Discussion] Re: discussion digest, Vol 1 #158 - 2 msgs, Dilip, 10/11/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.