Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Andreas,

I will test INADDR_ANY case and let you know.

BTW, unmodified pre15 codes cannot be cleanly compiled under Solaris 2.6.
Especially, adl_receive_message() in "adaptation.c" causes many errors.
(for example, Sol2.6 "sys/socket.h" does not have CMSG_SPACE stuffs)
And as I have mentioned, routing socket related codes also cause errors.

Note: I use Sun Forte 6 C/C++ compiler to build sctplib pre15, since I'm not
much experienced with gcc.
The following is my test platforms for sctplib pre15. (Machine, O/S, Compiler)
- Sun UltraSPARC 10, Solaris 2.6, Forte C/C++ Version 6 update 1
- Compaq Integrity S5000 Fault Tolerant Server, NonStop/UX C52, O/S Bundled C
compiler
- Intel Pentium 3 PC, Caldera OpenLinux 3.1, GCC 2.95.2

Chang Jin-woong
jwjang AT telcoware.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Jungmaier"
<ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de>
To:
<discussion AT sctp.de>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations
of SCTP)


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday, 24. January 2002 14:23, you wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone have a detailed documentation on usage of routing socket under
> > Solaris 2.x? While I compile pre15 on the Sol2.6, I noticed that Sol2.6
> > does have AF_ROUTE socket but could not found any documentation.
> > So I commented out all routing socket related codes from adaptation.c, and
> > pre15 compiled OK and runs well with echo_tool, echo_server programs.
> >
>
> Hi Chang,
>
> could you test also what happens if you specify INADDR_ANY as
> source address (specified with the -s parameter, i.e. -s 0.0.0.0)
> Then the new version pre15 should pick all the locally configured
> addresses and send them out with INIT or INIT ACK chunks.
> You can see what happens using ethereal (from http://www.ethereal.com )
> which should be available for Solaris also.
>
> If you have any problems or fixes, please mail them to me
> directly, for inclusion/correction in version pre16.
>
> However, I suspect that the solution used with FreeBSD should
> also work out under Solaris, or do you get substantial compile
> errors?
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> - --
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier | _
> Computer Networking Technology Group | ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
> University of Essen | - against HTML email X
> http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung | & vcards / \
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE8UEwSXAsLBNOCSsARAvEyAKCjpThU6z417eFHi8d9JforqULR0wCgvtUd
> +GMWGuFZdF/GlFQEOyvaKk4=
> =eDui
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP, David Gordon (LMC), 01/23/2002
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP, Michael Tuexen, 01/23/2002
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP, David Gordon (LMC), 01/23/2002
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP, Michael Tuexen, 01/23/2002
    • Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP), Andreas Jungmaier, 01/24/2002
      • Re: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP), Chang Jin-woong, 01/24/2002
        • Re: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP), Andreas Jungmaier, 01/24/2002
          • Re: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP), Chang Jin-woong, 01/24/2002
            • Re: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementations of SCTP), Andreas Jungmaier, 01/24/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.