- From: Tuexen Michael <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
- To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Subject: RE: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementati ons of SCTP)
- Date: Thu Jan 24 16:37:01 2002
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
Dear Chang Jin-woong,
we do not have a Solaris machine for testing and the guys
who were working on that can not do that anymore.
So if you can provide some patches to get it running on
Solaris we would like to include them in future releases.
The main problems should be in adaptation.c.
Best regards
Michael
Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CS SE 5 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: Chang Jin-woong
>
[SMTP:jwjang AT telcoware.com]
>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:10 PM
>
To:
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
Subject: Re: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different
>
implementations of SCTP)
>
>
Hi Andreas,
>
>
I will test INADDR_ANY case and let you know.
>
>
BTW, unmodified pre15 codes cannot be cleanly compiled under Solaris 2.6.
>
Especially, adl_receive_message() in "adaptation.c" causes many errors.
>
(for example, Sol2.6 "sys/socket.h" does not have CMSG_SPACE stuffs)
>
And as I have mentioned, routing socket related codes also cause errors.
>
>
Note: I use Sun Forte 6 C/C++ compiler to build sctplib pre15, since I'm not
>
much experienced with gcc.
>
The following is my test platforms for sctplib pre15. (Machine, O/S,
>
Compiler)
>
- Sun UltraSPARC 10, Solaris 2.6, Forte C/C++ Version 6 update 1
>
- Compaq Integrity S5000 Fault Tolerant Server, NonStop/UX C52, O/S Bundled
>
C compiler
>
- Intel Pentium 3 PC, Caldera OpenLinux 3.1, GCC 2.95.2
>
>
Chang Jin-woong
>
jwjang AT telcoware.com
>
>
----- Original Message -----
>
From: "Andreas Jungmaier"
>
<ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de>
>
To:
>
<discussion AT sctp.de>
>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:01 AM
>
Subject: Re: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different
>
implementations of SCTP)
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On Thursday, 24. January 2002 14:23, you wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > Does anyone have a detailed documentation on usage of routing socket
>
> > under
>
> > Solaris 2.x? While I compile pre15 on the Sol2.6, I noticed that Sol2.6
>
> > does have AF_ROUTE socket but could not found any documentation.
>
> > So I commented out all routing socket related codes from adaptation.c,
>
> > and
>
> > pre15 compiled OK and runs well with echo_tool, echo_server programs.
>
> >
>
>
>
> Hi Chang,
>
>
>
> could you test also what happens if you specify INADDR_ANY as
>
> source address (specified with the -s parameter, i.e. -s 0.0.0.0)
>
> Then the new version pre15 should pick all the locally configured
>
> addresses and send them out with INIT or INIT ACK chunks.
>
> You can see what happens using ethereal (from http://www.ethereal.com )
>
> which should be available for Solaris also.
>
>
>
> If you have any problems or fixes, please mail them to me
>
> directly, for inclusion/correction in version pre16.
>
>
>
> However, I suspect that the solution used with FreeBSD should
>
> also work out under Solaris, or do you get substantial compile
>
> errors?
>
>
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - --
>
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier | _
>
> Computer Networking Technology Group | ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
>
> University of Essen | - against HTML email X
>
> http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung | & vcards / \
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>
>
> iD8DBQE8UEwSXAsLBNOCSsARAvEyAKCjpThU6z417eFHi8d9JforqULR0wCgvtUd
>
> +GMWGuFZdF/GlFQEOyvaKk4=
>
> =eDui
>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> discussion mailing list
>
> discussion AT sctp.de
>
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
discussion mailing list
>
discussion AT sctp.de>
>
>
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
- RE: Routing socket (was: [SCTP-Discussion] Different implementati ons of SCTP), Tuexen Michael, 01/24/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.