Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Dear Rajesh,

that behaviour is OK. We have no implemented the OOTB correctly. If you want
to use two instances of the library on one host you must switch it of. Using
command line arguments this can be done by using -i in the terminal, *_server
programs in that directory but unfortunately not in the mulp.

Nevertheless, we suggest not to use multiple instances of the library running on
the same host because if you want this you have to switch of the OOTB.

Best regards
Michael

On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 07:14 AM, rkgupta wrote:

hi,

I am unable to esablish SCTP association between two SCTP endpoints (both
are in same machine) using
mulp test program(in sctplib/programs dir.) of version 14 and 15. I am
getting CommunicationLost notification whichever SCTP start association.

But that is working fine in version 7 and 9.


rgds,
Rajesh

*********************************************************
Disclaimer

This message (including any attachments) contains
confidential information intended for a specific
individual and purpose, and is protected by law.
If you are not the intended recipient, you should
delete this message and are hereby notified that
any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it,
is strictly prohibited.

*********************************************************
Visit us at http://www.mahindrabt.com
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Roland Gloeckler, 02/01/2002
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Brian F. G. Bidulock, 02/01/2002
    • [SCTP-Discussion] Problem in SCTP mulp test program, rkgupta, 02/12/2002
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Problem in SCTP mulp test program, Michael Tuexen, 02/12/2002
        • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Problem in SCTP mulp test program, Andreas Jungmaier, 02/12/2002
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Roland Gloeckler, 02/21/2002
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Brian F. G. Bidulock, 02/21/2002
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Tuexen Michael, 02/21/2002
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Brian F. G. Bidulock, 02/21/2002
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Tuexen Michael, 02/21/2002
    • Re: [Tsvwg] RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Randall Stewart, 02/21/2002
      • Re: [Tsvwg] RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, Brian F. G. Bidulock, 02/22/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.