- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock AT openss7.org>
- To: Randall Stewart <randall AT stewart.chicago.il.us>
- Cc: Tuexen Michael <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>, "'tsvwg AT ietf.org'" <tsvwg AT ietf.org>, "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming
- Date: Fri Feb 22 04:42:02 2002
- Dsn-notification-to: <bidulock AT openss7.org>
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
- Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Randall,
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Randall Stewart wrote:
>
Now the above case IS legal and there is specific wording in
>
the RFC that covers this.
Could you point to the section of the RFC that requires
that this scenario be permitted?
--brian
--
Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
bidulock AT openss7.org
¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦
¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦
¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming, (continued)
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.