SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Re: [Tsvwg] RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock AT openss7.org>
  • To: Randall Stewart <randall AT stewart.chicago.il.us>
  • Cc: Tuexen Michael <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>, "'tsvwg AT ietf.org'" <tsvwg AT ietf.org>, "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
  • Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming
  • Date: Fri Feb 22 04:42:02 2002
  • Dsn-notification-to: <bidulock AT openss7.org>
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
  • Organization: http://www.openss7.org/

Randall,

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Randall Stewart wrote:

> Now the above case IS legal and there is specific wording in
> the RFC that covers this.

Could you point to the section of the RFC that requires
that this scenario be permitted?

--brian



--
Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
bidulock AT openss7.org
¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦
¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦
¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page