- From: Andreas Jungmaier <ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de>
- To: discussion AT sctp.de, "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock AT openss7.org>
- Cc: discussion AT sctp.de, Alberto Bellettato <alberto.bellettato AT icn.siemens.it>
- Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Re: Performances of high speed data transmission
- Date: Mon Feb 18 12:27:01 2002
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
- Organization: University Essen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Brian,
>
On our openss7 LiS STREAMS implementation we are pulling maximum
>
throughputs on the order of 30000 32-byte packets per second on
>
100Mb/s for an effective throughput of 7.68Mb/s. So, while there
>
is a higher tax associated with SCTP, it is still possible to
>
acheive comparable performance with a kernel implementation of
>
SCTP.
...incidentally, what is the current status of the OpenSS7
implementation ?
I haven't had the time to look at it for a while now - on
your website you mention it is rock-solid.
- From your experience, what would be the difficulty porting it
to a 2.4 linux (it says there, that it runs on a 2.2 kernel)?
Or is that just a consequence of using the LiS at the time where
LiS did not support 2.4 ?
How much of the socket-api does your implementation support?
Best regards,
Andreas
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier | _
Computer Networking Technology Group | ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
University of Essen | - against HTML email X
http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung | & vcards / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8cOQBXAsLBNOCSsARArDVAKDrVnUiVJMBo5DE1xSCdLr+Txn38QCgjdg5
xI1w5HJOwup0O0BIFgLDzkA=
=sZmn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.