Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hello Satendra,
If i am understanding what you want to say, You are talking about the
redundancy support to each of associations,
the TCB syncup will help on per association bases, but it's difficult to
sync up SSN's between two TCB, if i am not
wrong we need some redundant info at SCTP of TSN:SSN map before sending it
to peer.
Hari


> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> discussion-admin AT sctp.de
>
> [mailto:discussion-admin AT sctp.de]On
> Behalf Of
> discussion-request AT sctp.de
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 3:32 PM
> To:
> discussion AT sctp.de
> Subject: discussion digest, Vol 1 #324 - 3 msgs
>
>
> Send discussion mailing list submissions to
>
> discussion AT sctp.de
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>
> discussion-request AT sctp.de
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>
> discussion-admin AT sctp.de
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of discussion digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. sctp hot standby feature (satendra)
> 2. RE: sctp hot standby feature (Tuexen Michael)
> 3. Re: sctp hot standby feature (Brian F. G. Bidulock)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "satendra"
> <satendra AT softhome.net>
> To:
> discussion AT sctp.de
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:11:31 +0530
> charset="US-ASCII"
> Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
>
>
>
>
>
> I want the following configuration :
> Two or more server(client) in association with a client one active
> and one standby(automatic switch where active fails ) how can get that
> in sctp??
>
> Please help
> Thanks in anticipation
>
> Satendra
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: Tuexen Michael
> <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
> To: "'satendra'"
> <satendra AT softhome.net>,
>
> discussion AT sctp.de
> Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:16:10 +0200
> charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> Satendra,
>
> the two servers need to share the TCB. This is the same
> as for TCP. It is highly dependend on the the implementation
> of SCTP. For the prototype we do not support this.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
> Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
> ICN WN CC SE 7 e-Mail:
> Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: satendra
> > [mailto:satendra AT softhome.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:42 PM
> > To:
> > discussion AT sctp.de
> > Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I want the following configuration :
> > Two or more server(client) in association with a client one active
> > and one standby(automatic switch where active fails ) how can get that
> > in sctp??
> >
> > Please help
> > Thanks in anticipation
> >
> > Satendra
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discussion mailing list
> > discussion AT sctp.de
> > http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 02:28:52 -0600
> From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock"
> <bidulock AT openss7.org>
> To: Tuexen Michael
> <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
> Cc: "'satendra'"
> <satendra AT softhome.net>,
>
> discussion AT sctp.de
> Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
> Reply-To:
> bidulock AT openss7.org
> Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
>
> Michael,
>
> Pehaps Satendra was more interested in RSERPOOL or SIGTRAN?
>
> --brian
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Tuexen Michael wrote:
>
> > Satendra,
> >
> > the two servers need to share the TCB. This is the same
> > as for TCP. It is highly dependend on the the implementation
> > of SCTP. For the prototype we do not support this.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Michael
> >
> > Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
> > Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
> > ICN WN CC SE 7 e-Mail:
> > Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: satendra
> > > [mailto:satendra AT softhome.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:42 PM
> > > To:
> > > discussion AT sctp.de
> > > Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I want the following configuration :
> > > Two or more server(client) in association with a client one active
> > > and one standby(automatic switch where active fails ) how can get that
> > > in sctp??
> > >
> > > Please help
> > > Thanks in anticipation
> > >
> > > Satendra
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discussion mailing list
> > > discussion AT sctp.de
> > > http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discussion mailing list
> > discussion AT sctp.de
> > http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
> --
> Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
> bidulock AT openss7.org
> ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦
> http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦
> ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦
> ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
> End of discussion Digest_______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] RE: discussion digest, Vol 1 #324 - 3 msgs, Harish Kulkarni, 07/20/2002
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] RE: discussion digest, Vol 1 #324 - 3 msgs, Michael Tuexen, 07/20/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.