Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Harish,

you are correct in principle. The design was as follows:
SCTP provides support for network fault tolerance. This is
done via support of multihoming. The point brought up is about
SCTP endpoint fault tolerance. This problem is handled in the RSerPool
Working group. RSerPool together with SCTP provides fault tolerance.

The SIGTRAN WG has developed special 'RSerPool' like solutions to deal
with the problem. They developed the Application Server process/ Application
Server process. Both solutions (RSerPool and SIGTRAN) do not want to
fail over the association but the layer on top of SCTP handles the
association failover tp another association. This layer can try to
hide as much as possible of this operation from its upper layer.

Best regards
Michael

On Tuesday, January 2, 1990, at 07:48 PM, Harish Kulkarni wrote:

Hello Satendra,
If i am understanding what you want to say, You are talking about the
redundancy support to each of associations,
the TCB syncup will help on per association bases, but it's difficult to
sync up SSN's between two TCB, if i am not
wrong we need some redundant info at SCTP of TSN:SSN map before sending it
to peer.
Hari

-----Original Message-----
From:
discussion-admin AT sctp.de

[mailto:discussion-admin AT sctp.de]On
Behalf Of
discussion-request AT sctp.de
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 3:32 PM
To:
discussion AT sctp.de
Subject: discussion digest, Vol 1 #324 - 3 msgs


Send discussion mailing list submissions to

discussion AT sctp.de

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

discussion-request AT sctp.de

You can reach the person managing the list at

discussion-admin AT sctp.de

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of discussion digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. sctp hot standby feature (satendra)
2. RE: sctp hot standby feature (Tuexen Michael)
3. Re: sctp hot standby feature (Brian F. G. Bidulock)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "satendra"
<satendra AT softhome.net>
To:
discussion AT sctp.de
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:11:31 +0530
charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature





I want the following configuration :
Two or more server(client) in association with a client one active
and one standby(automatic switch where active fails ) how can get that
in sctp??

Please help
Thanks in anticipation

Satendra




--__--__--

Message: 2
From: Tuexen Michael
<Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
To: "'satendra'"
<satendra AT softhome.net>,

discussion AT sctp.de
Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:16:10 +0200
charset="ISO-8859-1"

Satendra,

the two servers need to share the TCB. This is the same
as for TCP. It is highly dependend on the the implementation
of SCTP. For the prototype we do not support this.

Best regards
Michael

Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CC SE 7 e-Mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de

-----Original Message-----
From: satendra
[mailto:satendra AT softhome.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:42 PM
To:
discussion AT sctp.de
Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature






I want the following configuration :
Two or more server(client) in association with a client one active
and one standby(automatic switch where active fails ) how can get that
in sctp??

Please help
Thanks in anticipation

Satendra



_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

--__--__--

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 02:28:52 -0600
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock"
<bidulock AT openss7.org>
To: Tuexen Michael
<Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
Cc: "'satendra'"
<satendra AT softhome.net>,

discussion AT sctp.de
Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature
Reply-To:
bidulock AT openss7.org
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/

Michael,

Pehaps Satendra was more interested in RSERPOOL or SIGTRAN?

--brian

On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Tuexen Michael wrote:

Satendra,

the two servers need to share the TCB. This is the same
as for TCP. It is highly dependend on the the implementation
of SCTP. For the prototype we do not support this.

Best regards
Michael

Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CC SE 7 e-Mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de

-----Original Message-----
From: satendra
[mailto:satendra AT softhome.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:42 PM
To:
discussion AT sctp.de
Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] sctp hot standby feature






I want the following configuration :
Two or more server(client) in association with a client one active
and one standby(automatic switch where active fails ) how can get that
in sctp??

Please help
Thanks in anticipation

Satendra



_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

--
Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
bidulock AT openss7.org
¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦
¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦
¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦


--__--__--

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion


End of discussion Digest_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] RE: discussion digest, Vol 1 #324 - 3 msgs, Harish Kulkarni, 07/20/2002
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] RE: discussion digest, Vol 1 #324 - 3 msgs, Michael Tuexen, 07/20/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.