SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


[SCTP-Discussion] FW: SCTP...


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Shetty K Manjunatha-A1465Z <A1465Z AT motorola.com>
  • To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>, "'ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de'" <ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de>
  • Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] FW: SCTP...
  • Date: Thu Jan 1 18:57:00 2004
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>

All,
Any body can help in answer the question below?

Manjunatha Shetty K
Motorola Inc
Phone: 1-847-632-2503



-----Original Message-----
From: Shetty K Manjunatha-A1465Z
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 5:18 PM
To: 'Michael Tüxen'
Cc: Shetty K Manjunatha-A1465Z
Subject: RE: SCTP...


Micheal,

I have a quick question on SCTP stack. Quick response would really helpful.
If I am transmitting data from TSN 1 to TSN 200. But I am getting SACK or
ACK for all the frames other than say TSN 10. I am pumping the data at the
higher rate.
Will my SEND Q will store all the msgs with TSN value above 10 till I get ACK
for this msg or it will clear off all the msgs from the SEND Q which got ACK
from the PEER.

Scenario:
SCTP LOCAL SCTP PEER

Msg(TSN1) ==================>ACKED back Msg(TSN2)===================> ACKED
back .......................... .....
Msg(TSN10) ===================> NOT RECEIVED (Say Dropped) so no ACK. .....
Re transmission Msg(TSN10)====================> Dropped, no ACK .....
Msg(TSN99)====================> ACKED Msg(TSN100)===================>ACKED
Retransmission Msg(TSN10)===============> ACKED Now!!!!!

Now the question is what happens to SEND Q? Will store all the msgs(TSN 11 to
TSN 100) in the SEND Q till it gets the ACK for TSN 10 or not? Please clarify
me.

In the heavy traffic condition we are seeing that Send Q is getting full!
Your explanation on handling of SEND Q would be very helpful.

Manjunatha Shetty K
Phone: 1-847-632-2503



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Tüxen
[mailto:Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de]

Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:17 PM
To: Manjunatha Shetty
Subject: Re: SCTP...


Hi,

I can not remember that Bug. We are currently testing 1.0.0 of the
sctplib
for release and I will test that this works with the released version. You
report is very good, we can reproduce the scenario.

Do you have any further problems?

Best regards
Michael

On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 15:53 Europe/Berlin, Manjunatha Shetty
wrote:

> Thanks for the quick response,
>
> We are facing problems with sctp, Problem description is mentioned
> below.
>
> Can you please help in this regard. We are using SCTP stack which has
> SCTP Freeware..
>
> I could see in some FAQ present in SCTP discussion email list,where
> there are some problems in the area of re-transmission.
>
>
> Problem Sequence:
>
> SCTP Peer SCTP
> ---- ---------
>
> DATA REQ (TSN 10)
> -------------------------------------------> getting dropped
> DATA REQ (TSN 11)
> ------------------------------------------->
> SACK (TSN 11, GAP TSN 10)
> <------------------------------------------
> DATA REQ (TSN 10)
> ------------------------------------------> Re-Transmission, getting
> dropped
> DATA REQ (TSN 12)
> ------------------------------------------>
> SACK (TSN 12 GAP TSN 10)
> <------------------------------------------
> DATA REQ (TSN 13)
> ------------------------------------------>
> SACK (TSN 13, GAP TSN 10)
> <------------------------------------------
> DATA REQ (TSN 14)
> ------------------------------------------>
> SACK (TSN 14, GAP TSN 10)
> <------------------------------------------
>
> After the first retransmission there is no re-transmission, even
> though the SACK is indicating that there is a missing TSN 10.
>
> I really appreciate if could help me out in this regard. Whether this
> is a known bug or not?
>
> Thanks,
> Manju
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Tüxen
> [mailto:Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:06 PM
> To: Manjunatha Shetty
> Subject: Re: SCTP...
>
>
> Hi Manju,
>
> there is no such repository. Internally we use CVS but it not fix by
> fix...
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 10:39 Europe/Berlin, Manjunatha Shetty
> wrote:
>
>> Would like to know is there any repository where all the bug fixes
>> information are stored?
>>  
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Manju
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> | Manjunatha Shetty K.
>> | Wipro Technologies,
>> | Creator 4th Floor,
>> | International Tech Park,
>> | Whitefield Road.
>> | PH: 8411990     Extn: 1003
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  
>
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page