- From: Andreas Fink <afink AT global-networks.ch>
- To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
- Cc: "discussion (E-mail)" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4
- Date: Wed Sep 21 20:02:01 2005
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
2005-09-21 16:37:45 [10298] [2] DEBUG: SCTP[101] communication
lost (status 1)
Error Info: 16:37:45.976 - sctp_send: addressed association does
not exist
2005-09-21 16:37:45 [10298] [11] DEBUG: sctp_send: returns error
-3 Assoc not found
Could it be that you have multiple instances of the SCTPlib running
on a host.
This works only if you disable the OOTB handling.
No there is only one instance which owns the sctp raw port. There
might have been a version running and unsafely quit leaving open
ports on the remote side.
the association is re established by my application
2005-09-21 16:37:45 [10298] [11] DEBUG: SCTP[101] sctp instance
[1] associated and opened [193.53.0.180:8002] ->
[210.50.197.60:8002]. Assoc=[2]
Error Info: 16:37:46.362 - rxc_buffer instance not set !
2005-09-21 16:37:47 [10298] [2] DEBUG: SCTP[101] communication UP.
Assoc=2 (status 2)
2005-09-21 16:37:47 [10298] [2] DEBUG: SCTP[101] network status
change: path 0 is now ACTIVE
so far so good. I can now communicate and send M2PA packets back
and forth and upper layers come up.
Maybe first attempt, other side was not ready or so (can easily be
if you debug stuff with SCTPLib as the other side might not have
noticed you having shut down or such).
now I break the IP link on purpose (the bug I'm hunting in my app
is a non re-establishment of a M2PA link if the IP link in between
gets interrupted for a few seconds). I wouldt expect to get a
communication lost error after a few seconds or so. But I get
nothing. When I force a packet being sent I simply get:
Error Info: 16:46:07.277 - AF_INET : sendto()=-1 !
When you plug out a cable the routing table is changed and it may
happen
that you can not send a packet to a particular destination because you
have no route.
This is of course so. There is only one path and that one we broke
up. But SCTP should detect the loss of connectivity and signal it to
the upper layer (why else are there triggers for com-up and com-down?).
For SCTP it does not matter. It will not receive an ACK...
Yes it wont receive ack. my application should be notified of this
lack of communication but sctp lets me continue sending messages into
the blue.
Am I running into a bug or did I do something wrong?
I didn't see those new error messages in sctplib1.0.3 (havn't
tested the breaking of the link though).
There are not that much changes between 1.0.3 and 1.0.4...
Well I never had those errors in 1.0.3. That worries me.
Andreas Fink
Global Networks Schweiz AG
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tel: +41-61-6666330 Fax: +41-61-6666334 Mobile: +41-79-2457333
Global Networks Schweiz AG. Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
Web:
http://www.global-networks.ch/
afink AT global-networks.ch
------------------------------------------------------------------
ICQ: 101946485 MSN:
msn1 AT gni.ch
AIM: smsrelay Skype: andreasfink
Yahoo: finkconsulting SMS: +41792457333
PGP9: 0714 DF2B A189 A760 6201 5CBD D040 3E71 4DAF 68BB
- [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib & MacOS X 10.4, (continued)
- [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib & MacOS X 10.4, Andreas Fink, 09/20/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib & MacOS X 10.4, Michael Tuexen, 09/20/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib & MacOS X 10.4, Andreas Fink, 09/20/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib & MacOS X 10.4, Michael Tuexen, 09/20/2005
- [SCTP-Discussion] socketapi & MacOS X 10.4, Andreas Fink, 09/20/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] socketapi & MacOS X 10.4, Michael Tuexen, 09/21/2005
- [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4, Andreas Fink, 09/21/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4, Michael Tuexen, 09/21/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4, Andreas Fink, 09/21/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4, Michael Tuexen, 09/21/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4, Andreas Fink, 09/21/2005
- Message not available
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4, Andreas Fink, 09/27/2005
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] sctplib 1.0.4, Michael Tuexen, 09/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.