First login?
Lost password?
 
 
sctp-discussion AT lists.franken.de 
SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Unregisterinstace question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
  • To: elie AT flashmail.com
  • Cc: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
  • Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Unregisterinstace question
  • Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:31:16 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>
Hi Eli,

I would prefer sctp_shutdown() instead of sctp_abort(), but
there is no way in the API to tell an instance that it
should not accept associations anymore... That functionality
is missing in the API. Interesting, this problem did not show
up for years...

Best regards
Michael

On Mar 30, 2008, at 1:53 PM, elie wrote:
Hello all,

I've written a server application which waits for
connections. In the library, it call SCTP_registerInstance
and accepts new associations.

After some associations are accepted (say about 10), I would
like to terminate the operation (e.g. the user closes the
application). What I'm doing is calling, for each
associations, SCTP_abort than SCTP_deleteAssociation. Once
all the associations are deleted, SCTP_unregisterInstance is
called.

Now this is fine, the problem is that during the time the
associations are deleted, new ones are being accepted, so
SCTP_unregisterInstance fails (probably because there are
now new associations).

Is there a way to prevent the instance from accepting new
associations before unregistering it, or is there a better
design to it?

thanks,
Eli.


_______________________________________________
sctp-discussion mailing list
sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/sctp-discussion




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page