First login?
Lost password?
 
 
sctp-discussion AT lists.franken.de 
SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


[SCTP-Discussion] [an uncomfortable case when using sctptftp based on sctplib-1.0.8]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: 张文涛 <zhangwt1989 AT gmail.com>
  • To: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
  • Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] [an uncomfortable case when using sctptftp based on sctplib-1.0.8]
  • Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:23:14 +0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mJpC7NjkbFeTCtxWc5hAvKfBqD55Elpwv6wPlKacoGK78yJSB5A0KS7EmkSqzMGMCO 13jUNnmedq950n8rk2QHq7b2R2tl/Meh55yGGFAuOMpDiKKEXk+lJsOQXfiEE/Jj039f zdVMIl5BTh+3YOpotUlv0SAIv05oWOlQw9ElY=
  • List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>
Dear all,
    We have met an uncomfortable case when using the example application “sctptftp” based on sctplib to transport files between two single-address peers. Throughput in this case is much worse than expected, and worse than TCP.
    The specific circumstance is in the attachment.
    Hope you can solve the problem presented in part 5(more in part 6,7), or clarify the problem and find the real cause.
    Looking forward to your reply.
                                                                                                                            Wentao Zhang
                                                                                                                         E.E. Tsinghua University

Attachment: email.doc
Description: MS-Word document


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page