SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


[SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Enwereonye U.Promise" <uchprom AT yahoo.co.uk>
  • To: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
  • Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call
  • Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:32:52 +0100 (BST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B4x9lAIn0MjzbgFB2MGD2juJjtmHl/2wnmy+orYrzDLZ5FYEXLZkIgcvH68I+UykFhjIUlQVluu8ZT/WY6S5+1XhUAjfGKV5PsFKX4ZivKXHbzfzE4YXqNE5wSjACslhXYy7kqDedx0XTTDngR4ak3cl55XOXOPQNRPHl56pZqY=;
  • List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>

Hi,

I was considering a peer-to-peer implementation which could use SCTP as default transport layer protocol and was wondering if its enough to have the following socket calls; socket() ,  listen(),  sendmsg() or recvmsg(), close().

Thanks in advance for your reply.

Best Rgards,
Promise Enwereonye.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page