sctp-discussion - [SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call

Closed list
Subscribers: 0
Owners

sctp

Contact owners

Post

sctp-discussion AT lists.franken.de

SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help

[SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call

From: "Enwereonye U.Promise" <uchprom AT yahoo.co.uk>
To: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:32:52 +0100 (BST)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B4x9lAIn0MjzbgFB2MGD2juJjtmHl/2wnmy+orYrzDLZ5FYEXLZkIgcvH68I+UykFhjIUlQVluu8ZT/WY6S5+1XhUAjfGKV5PsFKX4ZivKXHbzfzE4YXqNE5wSjACslhXYy7kqDedx0XTTDngR4ak3cl55XOXOPQNRPHl56pZqY=;
List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>

Hi,

I was considering a peer-to-peer implementation which could use SCTP as default transport layer protocol and was wondering if its enough to have the following socket calls; socket() , listen(), sendmsg() or recvmsg(), close().

Thanks in advance for your reply.

Best Rgards,
Promise Enwereonye.

[SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call, Enwereonye U.Promise, 10/20/2010
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call, Thomas Dreibholz, 10/21/2010

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.