-
sctp
SCTP Discussions
Text archives Help
- From: Thomas Dreibholz <dreibh AT iem.uni-due.de>
- To: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
- Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:28:41 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>
- Organization: University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Experimental Mathematics
On Mittwoch 20 Oktober 2010, Enwereonye U.Promise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was considering a peer-to-peer implementation which could use SCTP as
> default transport layer protocol and was wondering if its enough to have
> the following socket calls; socket() , listen(), sendmsg() or recvmsg(),
> close().
These calls are already sufficient for the communication using the 1-to-many
style API. For configuring certain SCTP parameters, getsockopt() and
setsockopt() may furthermore be useful.
Best regards
--
=======================================================================
Dr. Thomas Dreibholz
University of Duisburg-Essen, Room ES210
Inst. for Experimental Mathematics Ellernstraße 29
Computer Networking Technology Group D-45326 Essen/Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail:
dreibh AT iem.uni-due.de
Homepage: http://www.iem.uni-due.de/~dreibh
=======================================================================
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call, Enwereonye U.Promise, 10/20/2010
- Re: [SCTP-Discussion] peer-to-peer socket call, Thomas Dreibholz, 10/21/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.
