Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Dear all,
see my comments below.
Michael

Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CS SE 51 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yiwen Jiang
> [SMTP:Yiwen.Jiang AT tic.siemens.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 9:38 PM
> To:
> 'discussion AT sctp.de'
> Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Re: SCTP implementation
>
> > What we have now is just enough that an adventuresome developer could
> > write a working SCTP application with our code. Our direction is
> > toward implementing the UDP-style interface first. Naturally, we'd be
> > thrilled to have some developers start pounding on our
> > implementation.
> If I was goign to use your implementation, how do you support multi-stream
> in the UDP-style interface?
>
> > If stability and OO methods are important to you, I strongly recommend
> > Andreas' and Michael's implementation. If you'd like to help shake
> > out the design of the UDP-style interface, try our implementation.
> >
> Thank you for your suggestion... I'll look more into the code and try to
> make a decision.. I really like the sound of kernel implementation for SCTP,
> but stability is quite important for me as well...
>
> > > > HP has a very nice implementation for HPUX, and Cisco's IOS
> > > > implementation performed well too.
> > > >
> > > > That's all the publicly announced kernel implementations.
> > If you wish
> > > > to hear about more, watch the TSV list. Several vendors have
> > >
> > > What is the TSV list? How do I subscribe it?
> >
> > Start here: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/tsvwg-charter.html
> I went there, but there was no mentioning of SCTP, but more for new
> developments on TCP... ?
[Tuexen Michael] The SCTP was moved from the SIGTRAN group to the
TSVWG just some weeks ago. That's why it is
not mentioned.
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] Re: SCTP implementation, Yiwen Jiang, 03/12/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Re: SCTP implementation, La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll, 03/13/2001
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Re: SCTP implementation, Yiwen Jiang, 03/13/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Re: SCTP implementation, La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll, 03/14/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Re: SCTP implementation, Tuexen Michael, 03/14/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.