Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 03:39:38PM -0600,
burzum AT usa.net
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Sorry for the lameness - I didn't provide the -s source address ...:))

I think that it is not you but the examples that are in fact pretty lame
for *coredumping* when arguments are missing. This is extremely confusing for
new users. Michael, Andreas: can we fix this?

Marc

>
> Running with -s source_addr works, but I am unable to test it. I use
> echo_tool
> to test. For example:
>
> terminal1: ./echo_server -s 198.168.1.1 -V
> terminal2: ./echo_tool -s 198.168.1.2 -s 198.168.1.1 -n 100 -V
>
> I get the following output:
>
> terminal1(echo_server):
> 1 : Communication up (1 paths)
> 1 : Communication lost (status 1)
>
>
> terminal2(echo_tool):
> 1 : Communication lost (status 1)
>
> Both are run by 'root'. What is the correct way to run the tests??
>
> Thank you
> Marsel
>
> Michael T?xen
> <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
> wrote:
> Dear Marsel,
>
> have you supplied at least one source address?
>
> /echo_server
>
> will segfault.
>
> /echo_server -s 192.168.1.1
>
> should run when started as root (I assume that one of your addresses is
> 192.168.1.1).
>
> We should check the command line arguments and I will write that stuff for
> pre11.
> If you still encounter problems, please do not hesitate to contact us.
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
>
> --
> e-mail:
> Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2001,
> burzum AT usa.net
>
> <burzum AT usa.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Hello all
> >
> >Just downloaded the sctplib-1.0.0-pre9. Compiled with not problems under
> >Linux RH 7.0, but when I try to run echo_server, it segfaults right away.
> >Running the prog in gdb, shows that the timer list was un-initialized, and
> it
> >segfaults when trying to access the list elements. My questions:
> >1) Does the timer list have to be initialized? The timer is initialized in
> >the adl_init_adaptation_layer(), but it is apparently not called anywhere.
> >
> >2) Has anyone else had this problem?
> >
> >Thank you
> >Marsel
> >
> >____________________________________________________________________
> >Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
> >_______________________________________________
> >discussion mailing list
> >discussion AT sctp.de
> >http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>

---

• Re: [Re: [SCTP-Discussion] echo_server setfaults], burzum, 05/01/2001
  • Re(2): [Re: [SCTP-Discussion] echo_server setfaults], Michael Tüxen, 05/02/2001
  • Re: [Re: [SCTP-Discussion] echo_server setfaults], Marc Boucher, 05/03/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.