- From: Tuexen Michael <Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de>
- To: "'discussion AT sctp.de'" <discussion AT sctp.de>
- Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] multiple instances
- Date: Wed May 30 13:24:01 2001
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
Dear all,
see my comments below.
Best regards
Michael
Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CS SE 5 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: Sim Woon Chiat ICM CA MS MI E7 Extern
>
[SMTP:WoonChiat.Sim.extern AT icn.siemens.de]
>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:09 AM
>
To:
>
'discussion AT sctp.de'
>
Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] multiple instances
>
>
hi, i have the following questions:
>
>
1. It is stated in the document sctp-api-1.0-1 (section 4 : Features of
>
Implementation) of the sctp library that "There can be several SCTP
>
instances per host, provided they have a set of disjoint local transport
>
addresses." Does that mean that we cannot have multiple instances monitoring
>
different ports on the same hosts with the same IP addresses?
>
[Tuexen Michael] We do support multiple SCTP processes
on a host with disjoint sets of IP-addresses. But keep in
mind you have to set up the IP forwarding correctly which
may be difficult on Linux.
>
2. If there are multiple instances running within a process (from what i
>
gather from previous posts, its possible), when you have a
>
communicationUpNotif, how do we tell which instances the new association
>
belongs to?
>
[Tuexen Michael] I'm not sure what the problem is. You only
need the assoc id and if you wnat to know the local and remote
port number of the assoc use the get_assoc_state (in pre10).
>
thanks for your time. sorry if the answers are obvious.
>
wc
[Tuexen Michael] Answers are only obvious in math. And verifying this
can take some days...
>
_______________________________________________
>
discussion mailing list
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.