Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday, 30. May 2001 08:16, you wrote:
> > > 2. If there are multiple instances running within a process (from what
> > > i gather from previous posts, its possible), when you have a
> > > communicationUpNotif, how do we tell which instances the new
> > > association belongs to?
> >
> > [Tuexen Michael] I'm not sure what the problem is. You only
> > need the assoc id and if you wnat to know the local and remote
> > port number of the assoc use the get_assoc_state (in pre10).
>
> [Schruefer Wolfgang] I have the same problem, because my upper layer
> wants to create 2 instances with different local ports, but equal callback
> functions. When communicationUpNotif() is called at the server side, he
> does not know to which instance it belongs. To give him a chance to
> determine it, I would suggest to add the instanceID in the struct
> SCTP_AssociationStatus. Is this possible?
>

Hello all,

I see where the problem is. My colleague, Thomas Dreibholz, is right
now working on a socket adaptation layer, that will enable an application
to use the socket-like API.
For this, we will need the instance id in every callback function
(i.e. CommUp, DataArrive and so on).
I have already a modified version which will be released after some
testing later this week.

Best regards,
Andreas Jungmaier

- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
\|/ _____ \|/ Andreas Jungmaier, Dipl.-Ing.
"@'/ , . \`@" University of Essen
ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de
/_| \___/ |__\ -> Computer Networking Tel. : +49 (0201) 183-7636
\___U_/ Technology Group <-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP Public Key and Fingerprint: see http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7FUb2d2Uw+xBvGUIRAgHnAKCjMoSXdleamVolHubgYcF1xQwuKgCdFFG5
vHL3jMt3t6hEOAPgco/US+M=
=Dbr5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

• AW: [SCTP-Discussion] multiple instances, Schruefer Wolfgang, 05/30/2001
  • Re: AW: [SCTP-Discussion] multiple instances, Andreas Jungmaier, 05/30/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.