Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Can you expand on your comment below about the reference
implementation being "probably more solid and complete" than the
sctplib version of SCTP?

Is it the intent of the sctplib developer's to make the
implementation "more solid and complete"?

Could you comment on what is planned for sctplib in the future?
Will it continue as a library that executes in user space. Will it
evolve to become a kernel implementation. Is continuity planned for
the forseeable future?

I am also interested in where you see SCTP heading. I am hearing
mixed reactions (+ to -) from my contacts in NA at companies ranging
from equipment vendors to network service providers.

How could sctplib not be solid with such a large user community?
Unless I am completely missing something, it appears to me that the
user interaction for sctplib has higher volume than any other SCTP
group available. I've subscribed to every SCTP group that I can
find and the sctplib group is the ONLY group from which I see
interaction. Can someone help me get plugged in to other SCTP
discussions if they exist?

Best regards,
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andreas Jungmaier"
<ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de>
To:
<discussion AT sctp.de>;
"Mohammed P.A Ashraf "
<ashraf.mohammed AT lycos.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on
implementation


: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
: Hash: SHA1
:
: On Thursday, 25. October 2001 15:04, Mohammed P.A Ashraf wrote:
: > Thanks a lot for ur quick reply.The fact is that iam very new to
this
: > transport protocol and am trying to understand this by going
thru the
: > impelmentation(along with RFC). And bcoz of this I may not be
able to come
: > with the patch immediately..Although i shall be thinking in
these lines as
: > i go thru the ref. implementation.
: >
:
: Make sure that before you try to understand the implementation,
: you look at the documents (html and pdf) that come with our
: implementation. BTW, "our implementation" refers to the one from
: http://www.sctp.de, whereas the reference implementation refers
: to the (probably more complete and more solid) implememtation done
: by Randy Stewart (get it from www.sctp.org).
:
: Regards,
: Andreas
:
: - --
: - ----------------------------------------------------------------
--------
: Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier |
_
: Computer Networking Technology Group | ASCII ribbon campaign
( )
: University of Essen | - against HTML email
X
: http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung | & vcards
/ \
: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
: Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
: Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
:
: iD8DBQE72CZAXAsLBNOCSsARAuSXAJwNW6YJ0tWEnkBRK01oRUcyZCoc+ACgmVrt
: Q+ApH0El2rQBWHy40hak2ok=
: =xN17
: -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
: _______________________________________________
: discussion mailing list
:
discussion AT sctp.de
: http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Mohammed P.A Ashraf , 10/24/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Andreas Jungmaier, 10/25/2001
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Mohammed P.A Ashraf , 10/25/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Andreas Jungmaier, 10/25/2001
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Michael Mueller, 10/25/2001
        • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll, 10/26/2001
          • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Phillip Conrad, 10/26/2001
          • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Andreas Jungmaier, 10/26/2001
            • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll, 10/26/2001
              • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Some general queries on implementation, Randall Stewart at work, 10/26/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.