Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi,

I'm sorry, I made a simple mistake. I am experimenting with two SCTP
implementations: one from Siemens and UofEssen (sctp.de), and the other from
Randall Stewart (stcp.org). No wonder I got my daemons mixed up...

Thank you for your answers nonetheless

David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sim Woon Chiat ICM CA MS MI E7 Extern
> [mailto:WoonChiat.Sim.extern AT icn.siemens.de]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:12 AM
> To:
> 'discussion AT sctp.de'
> Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP daemon and sctp_test_app don't
> connect remotely
>
>
> hi,
>
> I do not quite understand the output from David's mail, as
> the daemon in
> this case does not seem to be sctpd, but sctpDeamon. I am not
> too sure which
> daemon is this (if there is more than one), but the output
> from starting
> that daemon is also unfamiliar to me.
>
> That said, i would like to make a note that the developers of
> the the daemon
> (sctpd) and its test programs in the sctplib have not tested
> them against
> IPv6. Also, like what Michael said, there is no flow control
> in the IPC
> between the daemon and the apps using it.
>
> Besides the lack of flow control, the daemon has other
> missing features. One
> would be that it does not do fragmentation and reassembly.
> The size of each
> message sent should be 1400 (assuming MTU of 1500) bytes or less.
>
> The original intention of the daemon was to allow multiple
> application to
> make use of the sctplib on the same machine. So, running apps
> against a
> remote daemon have not been tested.
>
> hopes this helps.
> wc

---

• RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP daemon and sctp_test_app don't connect remotely, Sim Woon Chiat ICM CA MS MI E7 Extern, 02/04/2002
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP daemon and sctp_test_app don't connect remotely, David Gordon (LMC), 02/06/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.