SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Re: [SCTP-Discussion] ADDIP implementation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andreas Jungmaier <ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de>
  • To: "Eng Se-Hsieng" <g0202512 AT nus.edu.sg>
  • Cc: discussion AT sctp.de
  • Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] ADDIP implementation
  • Date: Mon Apr 14 11:47:01 2003
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
  • Organization: University Duisburg-Essen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 12 April 2003 09:09, you wrote:
> > Single-homing probably works fine, as a client will not send its address
> > in the INIT.
>
> Does this mean that in your implementation, all INIT chunks do not send out
> their IP address if the host is single-homed. What about INIT-ACK chunks?

If the host is single-homed, there will be no AddressParameter in either
INIT- or INIT-ACK chunk. If it is multi-homed (i.e. has more than one
address), the addresses will be listed in INIT or INIT-ACK chunks.

> I'm trying to overcome two NATs (one private IP via WLAN, another via
> GPRS). Would you happen to have any suggestions? My WLAN provider does not
> support external port reservation.

That depends on your setup. Can you send a picture ? Where
is your client, where the server etc....

Regards,
Andreas

- --
Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier
Computer Networking Technology Group
University of Duisburg-Essen
http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung
My PGP Key-ID: D3824AC0

My PGP Key-Fingerprint: 228C 7C2C 3381 2DD4 9998 2812 5C0B 0B04 D382 4AC0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+moPcXAsLBNOCSsARAlvfAKDi4yubLRZecyeKITj+g/NpaM4QXgCfUjbI
/j2Sjp3vBNxNXHOtihy+ZNY=
=UTY9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page