First login?
Lost password?
 
 
sctp-discussion AT lists.franken.de 
SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


[SCTP-Discussion] SCTP Versions (was : Undefined reference to SCTP function calls during compilation)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andreas Jungmaier <ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de>
  • To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>, "Mohit Gupta" <mgupta AT ucdavis.edu>
  • Cc: <discussion AT sctp.de>
  • Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP Versions (was : Undefined reference to SCTP function calls during compilation)
  • Date: Tue Nov 11 13:02:01 2003
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
  • Organization: University Duisburg-Essen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael, dear all,

I would still encourage everyone to use the "experimental" version
1.1.X and report any bugs you find. So the statement from my point
of view should rather have been:
"The 1.1.3 version is experimental. Please use it". :-)

Please do not hesitate posting any findings here on this list !
This helps to further improve the quality of the software.

Please note:
the 1.0.X branch is the STABLE tree, which supports SCTP according
to RFC 2960, RFC3309, Parts of the Implementer's Guide, and
PR-SCTP. (please note, that path mtu discovery is missing from
this tree). STABLE in this context means, it has been tested by many
more people, and to a much greater extension than the second branch.
(and I have to thank all of you who contributed to this testing, especially
Michael and Thomas).

The 1.1.X branch is the DEVEL tree. In this tree, you may
find many more features, but also potentially more bugs than in
the STABLE series. The DEVEL tree also contains support for
Add-IP, which may be why many people will be interested in using
this rather than the STABLE series, and does now come with
path mtu discovery as well. All other features are similar to what
the STABLE branch supports.

======================================================================
Note also:
both STABLE and DEVEL versions currently have a few (important)
bugs which will soon be fixed in upcoming new releases.
======================================================================

Stay tuned !

Best regards,
Andreas

P.S.: the problem Gupta had was simply a forgotten flag to tell the
linker to also use the socketapi-library when linking.


On Monday 10 November 2003 23:19, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> The 1.1.3 version is experimental. Please try the 1.0.0 stable version.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>

- --
Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Jungmaier
Computer Networking Technology Group
University of Duisburg-Essen
http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung
PGP Key-ID: D382 4AC0

PGP Key-Fingerprint: 228C 7C2C 3381 2DD4 9998 2812 5C0B 0B04 D382 4AC0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/si5tXAsLBNOCSsARAoetAKDZYWNCctRHq9XDRLOeI+Wdb+iu9ACgjgtb
GB+TwoDGdasyXjC2r78ZbrE=
=HHoj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page