Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello all,

it seem as if I would need to brush up a few things in the
manual. I will try to add some sections there in the next release,
about how to correctly use the library
(I thought that was "clear" from the example programs...)

Regards,

Andreas
>
> we observed problems like you when we went into the eventLoop without
> calling sctp_registerInstance() before. As I understand the code, the
> function sctp_registerInstance() must be the very first SCTP-function
> called by ULP because the general initialisation is done there.
>

> >
> > I've tried to make the SCTP_eventloop work in my code and now i get
> > everytime a Segementation fault. After firing up GDB, I found out that is
> > was located in the sctp_eventloop, during function call to
> > get_msecs_to_nexttimer, DLL_IsListEmpty.
> > Input to DLL_IsListEmpty is (0x00) which then leads to the segement
> > fault. This looks like a uninitialised pointer(it should point to NULL or
> > at least one element should be in the list because it makes a check not
> > to the pointer but to pointer->head(which in the present situation is
> > clearly "A bridge too far", even when the pointer itself was NULL))
> >
> > BTW is 0x00 equivalent to NULL or it that dependent on OS representation.
> >
> > I noticed that there was also a init_timer_list functions, but that as
> > far as I can see , not a single line of code in SCTP does call that
> > function to initialise the timer_list.
> >
> > So my question is:
> > - did I forget something in my code for initialising (looked in the
> > examples didn't bring up anything this far)?
> > - might there be a error in the SCTP lib?
> >
> > Help is always gratefully accepted. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > yours sincerly,
> > Lode

- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
void hamlet()
{#define question=((bb)||(!bb))}
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andreas Jungmaier, Dipl.-Ing.
University of Essen email:
ajung AT exp-math.uni-essen.de
Computer Networking Technology Group Tel. : +49 (0201) 183-7636
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP Public Key and Fingerprint: see http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~ajung
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6yZA1d2Uw+xBvGUIRAmuhAJ9VGmgEAvFkwwj8QpkUrvC+9jy09gCfUJty
rOL7fdwi31Coobve3XI49b0=
=g/Hu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

• AW: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Schruefer Wolfgang, 04/03/2001
  • Re: AW: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Andreas Jungmaier, 04/03/2001
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • AW: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Schruefer Wolfgang, 04/05/2001
  • AW: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Schruefer Wolfgang, 04/05/2001
    • [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion (was: Is the timer_list initialised?), Andreas Jungmaier, 04/05/2001
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion (was: Is the timer_list initialised?), Marc Boucher, 04/05/2001
        • Re(2): [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion (was: Is the timer_list initialised?), Michael Tüxen, 04/05/2001
          • Re: Re(2): [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion (was: Is the timer_list initialised?), Marc Boucher, 04/06/2001
            • Re(4): [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion (was: Is the timer_list initialised?), Michael Tüxen, 04/06/2001
              • Re: Re(4): [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion (was: Is the timer_list initialised?), Marc Boucher, 04/06/2001
              • Re(6): [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion (was: Is the timer_list initialised?), Michael Tüxen, 04/06/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.