Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Torbjoern,

are you using the C based API? We just found (and fixed) a
bug that in some cases the C based API was not working
correct when the association was closed by the peer.

Best regards
Michael

Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CC SE 7 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Torbjorn Andersson
> [SMTP:tora AT tora-pc.cs.kau.se]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:55 AM
> To:
> discussion AT sctp.de
> Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi
>
> Hi all SCTP-friends
>
> I'm sending data with modified testsender and testreceiver. The
> modifications
> are done at the testsender to enable users to specify the exakt amount data
> that is to be trasfered.
>
> The problem is that when I have sent all data, I do a close on the socket
> and
> then terminate. Saidly data in the sendbuffer is not transfered and the
> socket is prematurely closed and the program terminates.
>
> I have also tried Socket::shutdown() without succes.
>
> Is there any way one could wait for outstanding data to be acked before
> close
> is performed.
>
> /Torbj> örn
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Torbjorn Andersson, 04/25/2002
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Tuexen Michael, 04/25/2002
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Torbjorn Andersson, 04/25/2002
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Tuexen Michael, 04/25/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.