Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

The API which is documented in an ID is the C one.
Maybe the bug we found also affects your situation, but
reading your mail again annother point comes in my mind.

Are you making some socket calls, then a shutdown call
end then terminate your program? That will not work because
when you terminate your program the SCTP stack also terminates,
even if there are still some DATA chunks buffered and the association
is not closed. You should wait in your program some time (sleep(10))
before terminating.

The reason for this is that part of the sctplib runs in a seperate
thread. Your 'main' functions also runs in a thread. If you call
exit, the program terminates which forces also the sctplib thread to die.

Best regards
Michael

Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CC SE 7 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Torbjorn Andersson
> [SMTP:tora AT tora-pc.cs.kau.se]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:25 PM
> To:
> discussion AT sctp.de
> Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi
>
> I'm using the C++ version of the socketAPI. The programs I have modified
> are
> /netlogger/testsender and testreceiver.
>
> Sorry that I was unspecific in the question.
>
> /Torbj> örn
>
> torsdagen den 25 april 2002 12:38 You wrote:
> > Hi Torbjoern,
> >
> > are you using the C based API? We just found (and fixed) a
> > bug that in some cases the C based API was not working
> > correct when the association was closed by the peer.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Michael
> >
> > Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
> > Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
> > ICN WN CC SE 7 E-mail:
> > Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Torbjorn Andersson
> > > [SMTP:tora AT tora-pc.cs.kau.se]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:55 AM
> > > To:
> > > discussion AT sctp.de
> > > Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi
> > >
> > > Hi all SCTP-friends
> > >
> > > I'm sending data with modified testsender and testreceiver. The
> > > modifications are done at the testsender to enable users to specify the
> > > exakt amount data that is to be trasfered.
> > >
> > > The problem is that when I have sent all data, I do a close on the
> > > socket
> > > and then terminate. Saidly data in the sendbuffer is not transfered and
> > > the socket is prematurely closed and the program terminates.
> > >
> > > I have also tried Socket::shutdown() without succes.
> > >
> > > Is there any way one could wait for outstanding data to be acked before
> > > close is performed.
> > >
> > > /Torbj> örn
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discussion mailing list
> > > discussion AT sctp.de
> > > http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discussion mailing list
> > discussion AT sctp.de
> > http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Torbjorn Andersson, 04/25/2002
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Tuexen Michael, 04/25/2002
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Torbjorn Andersson, 04/25/2002
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi, Tuexen Michael, 04/25/2002

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.