- From: Torbjorn Andersson <tora AT tora-pc.cs.kau.se>
- To: discussion AT sctp.de
- Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi
- Date: Thu Apr 25 13:27:01 2002
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <discussion.sctp.de>
I'm using the C++ version of the socketAPI. The programs I have modified are
/netlogger/testsender and testreceiver.
Sorry that I was unspecific in the question.
/Torbjörn
torsdagen den 25 april 2002 12:38 You wrote:
>
Hi Torbjoern,
>
>
are you using the C based API? We just found (and fixed) a
>
bug that in some cases the C based API was not working
>
correct when the association was closed by the peer.
>
>
Best regards
>
Michael
>
>
Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
>
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
>
ICN WN CC SE 7 E-mail:
>
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Torbjorn Andersson
>
> [SMTP:tora AT tora-pc.cs.kau.se]
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:55 AM
>
> To:
>
> discussion AT sctp.de
>
> Subject: [SCTP-Discussion] SocketApi
>
>
>
> Hi all SCTP-friends
>
>
>
> I'm sending data with modified testsender and testreceiver. The
>
> modifications are done at the testsender to enable users to specify the
>
> exakt amount data that is to be trasfered.
>
>
>
> The problem is that when I have sent all data, I do a close on the socket
>
> and then terminate. Saidly data in the sendbuffer is not transfered and
>
> the socket is prematurely closed and the program terminates.
>
>
>
> I have also tried Socket::shutdown() without succes.
>
>
>
> Is there any way one could wait for outstanding data to be acked before
>
> close is performed.
>
>
>
> /Torbj> örn
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> discussion mailing list
>
> discussion AT sctp.de
>
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
discussion mailing list
>
discussion AT sctp.de
>
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.