Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

I would recommend to use the 1.0.2 version since we only
support the latest version. You only get the source code...
you have to build the binaries by your own.

Best regards
Michael

On Jan 3, 2005, at 0:44 Uhr,
hi_research AT yahoo.co.uk
wrote:

Hello,

Thanks for your help. Currently I am using
sctplib-1.0.1. To do this, do I need to install new
sctplib-1.0.2 and API? Could you please tell me more
about the source code of the sctplib? How can I get
this source code?

Thanks,
Babu

--- Michael Tuexen
<Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
wrote:

Hi Babu,

the SCTPlib does NOT support loadsharing. The only
way
to achieve this through the API is the change the
primary
path pretty often (for example before each send
call).
Any other behaviour has to be developed by you, but
you
get the source code. However, we provide support
(finding
bugs and so on) only based on the sctplib API.

Best regards
Michael

On Jan 3, 2005, at 0:02 Uhr,
hi_research AT yahoo.co.uk
wrote:

Hello,

Thank you so much for the email. Could you please

let

me know a little bit details? So far I know, SCTP

does

not support load sharing in its current form. But

I

would like to transfer data to all active paths
simultaneously using SCTP implementation provided

by

www.sctp.de. And I also would like to make a
comparison of the performance (for example

association

throughput) between Standard SCTP behavior(which
supports only single path data transfer; where
multihoming is used only for redundancy purpose)

and

load sharing SCTP behavior(which will support
concurrent multipath transfer)? Is it possible? I

am

using sctplib-1.0.1. Do I need to install new
sctplib-1.0.2 and API?

Thanks,
Babu

--- Michael Tuexen

<Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>

wrote:

Hi Babd,

you can change the primary path whenever you

want.

So there
is an API for you to do it. If you need more than
that, you
have the source code of the sctplib...
I hope this helps.

Best regards
Michael

On Jan 2, 2005, at 20:06 Uhr,
hi_research AT yahoo.co.uk
wrote:

Hello,

I would like to compare the performance of

Standard

SCTP and Load Sharing SCTP. May I check the
performance of load Sharing SCTP(Multi-path

transfer

SCTP)using this SCTP implementation?

Thanks,
Babu

___________________________________________________________

ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features -

even

more fun!

http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
discussion AT sctp.de
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

___________________________________________________________

ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even

more fun!

http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

___________________________________________________________
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] The performance of SCTP, hi_research AT yahoo.co.uk, 01/02/2005
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] The performance of SCTP, Michael Tuexen, 01/02/2005
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] The performance of SCTP, hi_research AT yahoo.co.uk, 01/03/2005
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] The performance of SCTP, Michael Tuexen, 01/03/2005
        • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] The performance of SCTP, hi_research AT yahoo.co.uk, 01/03/2005
          • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] The performance of SCTP, Michael Tuexen, 01/03/2005
            • [SCTP-Discussion] Multihoming feature of sctp, hi_research AT yahoo.co.uk, 01/11/2005
              • [SCTP-Discussion] Re: Multihoming feature of sctp, Michael Tuexen, 01/11/2005

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.