Hi Michael,I would be interested in any bug fixes. You might also want to make the
MT> On Aug 18, 2005, at 12:20 PM, David Pascoe wrote:
MT> This sounds good. I would like to ask you to provide the patches
MT> you made such that (if appropriate) we can incorporate them in the next
MT> version of the sctplib. This makes also your like easier when upgrading
MT> to a newer version of the sctplib.
that would be the easy bit ... hopefully only peripheral changes will be
required ; like to glue in timers, execution flow, memory management and
tx/rx of packets.
It should be OK for the sctplib.
I would be most happy to hear from someone who has ported sctp to an
embedded platform. My first concern is whether it requires a pre-emptive
OS ? our OS is all message passing, all threads run to completion, no
pre-emption possible.
Do you use a commercial OS on your box? Does it provide a build in SCTP stack?
MT> I would like to know what kind of product you are building, if it
MT> is possible for you to answer than question.
You want to move protocols running over RTP/UDP/IP over to SCTP/IP?
It is a modular router with lots of PBX and VoIP protocols supported. We
are looking for sctp to support several hundred associations being various
signalling protocols over RTP.
davidp.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.