SCTP Discussions

Text archives Help


Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Regarding features of SCTP


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
  • To: Vishwas Dubey <dubey.vishwas AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
  • Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Regarding features of SCTP
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:55:36 +0100
  • List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
  • List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>

On Jan 17, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Vishwas Dubey wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I am currently using kernel-2.6.35.14-97.fc14.i686 which does have support
> for SCTP. Please, let me know if the following features are supported in
> this kernel:-
Hi Vishwas,

this list is for supporting the sctplib userland implementation of SCTP.
Questions regarding the Linux kernel implementation of SCTP might be sent to
lksctp-developers AT lists.sourceforge.net.

Best regards
Michael
>
> 1) Is LKSCTP for kernel-2.6.35.14-97.fc14.i686 stable ? Does it have any
> issues pertaining to robustness ?
> 2) Hot stand-by redundancy (not multi-homing) - I want to have two
> different SCTP instances running on two different cards and want that once
> the primary card goes down, the second (or the redundant) card takes over
> having the same context as the primary card such that the services provided
> by the card does not get interrupted.
> 3) Dynamic addition of nodes during recovery from failure i.e. after the
> redundant card has taken over the control in 2.
> 4) Provision for stream-level statistics.
> 5) Customization of IPv6 header parameters (HOPLIMIT and TCLASS) of
> out-going SCTP packets (data and control chunks).
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Vishwas
> _______________________________________________
> sctp-discussion mailing list
> sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/sctp-discussion





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of page