- From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen AT micmac.franken.de>
- To: Vishwas Dubey <dubey.vishwas AT gmail.com>
- Cc: sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
- Subject: Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Regarding features of SCTP
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:55:36 +0100
- List-archive: <http://lists.franken.de/pipermail/sctp-discussion>
- List-id: SCTP Discussions <sctp-discussion.sctp.de>
On Jan 17, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Vishwas Dubey wrote:
>
Hi All,
>
>
I am currently using kernel-2.6.35.14-97.fc14.i686 which does have support
>
for SCTP. Please, let me know if the following features are supported in
>
this kernel:-
Hi Vishwas,
this list is for supporting the sctplib userland implementation of SCTP.
Questions regarding the Linux kernel implementation of SCTP might be sent to
lksctp-developers AT lists.sourceforge.net.
Best regards
Michael
>
>
1) Is LKSCTP for kernel-2.6.35.14-97.fc14.i686 stable ? Does it have any
>
issues pertaining to robustness ?
>
2) Hot stand-by redundancy (not multi-homing) - I want to have two
>
different SCTP instances running on two different cards and want that once
>
the primary card goes down, the second (or the redundant) card takes over
>
having the same context as the primary card such that the services provided
>
by the card does not get interrupted.
>
3) Dynamic addition of nodes during recovery from failure i.e. after the
>
redundant card has taken over the control in 2.
>
4) Provision for stream-level statistics.
>
5) Customization of IPv6 header parameters (HOPLIMIT and TCLASS) of
>
out-going SCTP packets (data and control chunks).
>
>
Thanks in advance.
>
>
Vishwas
>
_______________________________________________
>
sctp-discussion mailing list
>
sctp-discussion AT sctp.de
>
http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/sctp-discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.