Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

See my comments below
Best regards
Michael

Michael Tuexen Tel.: +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG Fax: +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CS SE 51 E-mail:
Michael.Tuexen AT icn.siemens.de

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yiwen Jiang
> [SMTP:Yiwen.Jiang AT tic.siemens.ca]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:32 PM
> To:
> 'discussion AT sctp.de'
> Subject: RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation
>
> > > I'm curious now... If SCTP was going to be directly on top
> > of IP, wouldn't
> > > it make sense for it to be in the kernel space? Or is that
> > just not an
> > > issue for your research interest?
> >
> > It would make sense, but is a LOT harder to implement !
> > There is a lot of research - and corporate - interest on both, though.
> >
> What about the kernel implementation from http://www.sctp.refcode.org/ ? Is
> there any relationship between you guys and them?
[Tuexen Michael] It is developed independently from us by some nice
guys from Motorola. It uses some part of Randy's reference implementation.
> > Before you start writing a Diameter server, I suggest you get
> > familiar with the SCTP :-)
> I would like to do that... I only started working on Diameter a week ago!-(
>
> I don't think one needed to know the fine details of TCP before one uses it
> to implement a daemon... From your comment, it seems that one needs to
> understand the nitty gritty of SCTP before doing Diameter then? What would
> the reason behind this? Or did I misunderstood?
[Tuexen Michael] You do not need all the deatails of an
SCTP implementation, but you should know the features of SCTP.
Lyndon Ong wrote a nice ID for that. Look at www.sctp.de to find
the URL. The API of SCTP is also still under discussion. We do
not use a socket like API, but a similiar API as discussed in RFC
2960.

> > Then you should start implemeting it. The current implementation
> > will be in beta state, and will probably be released next week.
> > And sufficient means a lot of different things for a lot of different
> > people. Hey ! It is sufficient ! :-)
> Thanks for the response! I'll have an eye out for the new release!
>
[Tuexen Michael] That is nice, Thanks.
> Cheers,
>
> Yiwen
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> discussion AT sctp.de
> http://www.sctp.de/mailman/listinfo/discussion

---

• [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Yiwen Jiang, 03/08/2001
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Michael Tüxen, 03/09/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll, 03/09/2001
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Yiwen Jiang, 03/09/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Andreas Jungmaier, 03/12/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Tuexen Michael, 03/12/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Yiwen Jiang, 03/12/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Andreas Jungmaier, 03/12/2001
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll, 03/13/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Tuexen Michael, 03/12/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Yiwen Jiang, 03/13/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Tuexen Michael, 03/14/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] SCTP implementation, Yiwen Jiang, 03/15/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.