Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

let's not reinvent the wheel

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 08:15:47AM -0400, Wagner, Joel wrote:
> How about a compromise? Use a struct that contains the IP address as it is
> represented on the net. This would: a) keep conversions to a minimum, b)
> work equally well for IPv4 and IPv6, c) make it easy to translate to/from
> various target required structs such as sockaddr_in, sockunion, etc.
>
> The struct could look something like:
>
> typedef struct {
> char ipa_bytes[IPA_MAX_ADDR_SIZE];
> int ipa_length;
> } IPaddress;
>

---

• RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, (continued)
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Coene Lode, 04/04/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Andreas Jungmaier, 04/04/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Coene Lode, 04/04/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Marc Boucher, 04/05/2001
      • Re(2): [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Michael Tüxen, 04/05/2001
        • Re: Re(2): [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Marc Boucher, 04/05/2001
      • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Andreas Jungmaier, 04/05/2001
        • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Marc Boucher, 04/05/2001
          • [SCTP-Discussion] Strings vs. Sockunion, Andreas Jungmaier, 04/05/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Wagner, Joel, 04/05/2001
    • Re: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Marc Boucher, 04/05/2001
  • RE: [SCTP-Discussion] Is the timer_list initialised?, Wagner, Joel, 04/05/2001

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.